kms.network

Akeyless vs Azure Key Vault

How Akeyless and Azure Key Vault differ on scope, key custody, deployment and cost.

AkeylessAzure Key Vault
TypeSaaS vaultCloud KMS
ScopeSecrets, keys, PKI, PAMKeys, secrets, certificates
DeploymentSaaS + hybrid gatewaySaaS (Azure)
Key custodyDistributed Fragments Cryptography — no single complete key existsPremium tier: FIPS 140-2 Level 2/3 HSMs; Managed HSM available
How it worksKey material is split into fragments held in separate places and never assembled, so operations happen without a whole key existing anywhere — including on Akeyless infrastructure. Delivered as SaaS with an optional on-premise gateway, which removes the cluster you would otherwise run.One service holding three different things: cryptographic keys, arbitrary secrets and TLS certificates. Standard is software-protected, Premium is HSM-backed, and Managed HSM gives a single-tenant pool. Certificate lifecycle is included, which the other clouds keep separate.
Pricing*Free tier; enterprise by quoteMetered per operation; Premium adds HSM
Free tierYesNo
Licence——
Best forVault capability without running VaultMicrosoft-centric estates

Akeyless

  • No cluster to operate or upgrade
  • Fragment architecture is a real answer to vendor trust
  • Usable free tier, not just a trial
  • Proprietary — you cannot inspect the core
  • Smaller community than Vault

Azure Key Vault

  • Covers three jobs other clouds split apart
  • Deep Entra ID and Azure integration
  • Managed HSM for single-tenant requirements
  • No free tier
  • Pricing spread across several meters

Bottom line

Choose Akeyless for vault capability without running vault. Choose Azure Key Vault for microsoft-centric estates.

* Published list pricing (vendor pricing pages, August 2026).