kms.network

Fortanix DSM vs Thales CipherTrust

How Fortanix DSM and Thales CipherTrust differ on scope, key custody, deployment and cost.

Fortanix DSMThales CipherTrust
TypeConfidential computing KMSEnterprise KMS
ScopeKeys, secrets, tokenisationKeys, encryption, tokenisation
DeploymentSaaS + on-premiseOn-premise + cloud
Key custodyIntel SGX enclaves; FIPS 140-2 Level 3Luna HSMs; FIPS 140-3 Level 3, Common Criteria
How it worksData Security Manager runs key operations inside confidential-computing enclaves rather than conventional HSM appliances, presenting one key management plane across multiple clouds and on-premise. Also covers tokenisation and, increasingly, post-quantum readiness.A manager plus a family of connectors covering database, file and application encryption, backed by Luna HSMs. It descends from Gemalto and SafeNet, which is precisely why it appears in compliance checklists — the pedigree is the product as much as the software is.
Pricing*Enterprise quoteEnterprise quote
Free tierNoNo
Licence——
Best forMulti-cloud estates with strict key custodyRegulated estates with auditors to satisfy

Fortanix DSM

  • One control plane across clouds and on-premise
  • Enclave model removes appliance sprawl
  • Strong regulated-industry track record
  • Enterprise pricing, enterprise sales cycle
  • Overspecified for single-cloud teams

Thales CipherTrust

  • Recognised by auditors without argument
  • Deepest hardware lineage on this list
  • Broad connector coverage for legacy systems
  • Expensive and sold enterprise-first
  • Heavier to deploy than cloud-native options

Bottom line

Choose Fortanix DSM for multi-cloud estates with strict key custody. Choose Thales CipherTrust for regulated estates with auditors to satisfy.

* Published list pricing (vendor pricing pages, August 2026).