kms.network

Thales CipherTrust vs AWS KMS

How Thales CipherTrust and AWS KMS differ on scope, key custody, deployment and cost.

Thales CipherTrustAWS KMS
TypeEnterprise KMSCloud KMS
ScopeKeys, encryption, tokenisationEncryption keys
DeploymentOn-premise + cloudSaaS (AWS)
Key custodyLuna HSMs; FIPS 140-3 Level 3, Common CriteriaFIPS 140-3 Level 3 validated HSMs
How it worksA manager plus a family of connectors covering database, file and application encryption, backed by Luna HSMs. It descends from Gemalto and SafeNet, which is precisely why it appears in compliance checklists — the pedigree is the product as much as the software is.Keys never leave the service — you call it to encrypt and decrypt rather than fetching key material. Envelope encryption is the normal pattern: KMS protects a data key, the data key protects your data. Every AWS service integrates natively, which is most of the value.
Pricing*Enterprise quote$1/key/mo + $0.03 per 10k requests
Free tierNoYes
Licence——
Best forRegulated estates with auditors to satisfyAnything already running on AWS

Thales CipherTrust

  • Recognised by auditors without argument
  • Deepest hardware lineage on this list
  • Broad connector coverage for legacy systems
  • Expensive and sold enterprise-first
  • Heavier to deploy than cloud-native options

AWS KMS

  • Integrated with essentially every AWS service
  • Key material never leaves the HSM boundary
  • Trivially cheap at small and moderate scale
  • Manages keys, not application secrets
  • Costs climb with request volume, not key count

Bottom line

Choose Thales CipherTrust for regulated estates with auditors to satisfy. Choose AWS KMS for anything already running on aws.

* Published list pricing (vendor pricing pages, August 2026).